Two separate reports from Ukrainian media, each based on their own sources, allege that Mykhailo Mudryk has failed a doping test.
The Chelsea winger is now awaiting the analysis of his B-sample, which will either confirm or dismiss the positive result found in the initial A-sample, reportedly collected in late October.
At this stage, there has been no official confirmation about the specific banned substance involved, nor clarity on whether the test was conducted by the Premier League or UEFA.
Notably, UEFA is often considered more stringent and thorough in monitoring doping violations compared to the Premier League.
Mudryk has not featured in competitive matches since scoring a remarkable goal in Chelsea’s 1-0 win over Heidenheim on November 28.
He has also been absent from the squad since December 1, when Chelsea faced Aston Villa.
The club has attributed his absence to an unspecified illness, though updates on his condition have been sparse and inconsistent in injury reports.
Considering Mudryk’s current role at Chelsea, where he is not seen as a pivotal first-team player, it would not be surprising if the club has opted for discretion regarding these allegations, should there be any substance to them.
There remains a strong possibility that the claims are unfounded, potentially amounting to nothing more than baseless rumors.
However, if the allegations prove accurate, the implications for Mudryk could be severe.
Doping violations typically carry heavy penalties, and recent cases underline the seriousness of such infractions.
For instance, Paul Pogba was recently banned for four years (later reduced to 18 months on appeal) after testing positive for DHEA during his time in Serie A.
If Mudryk’s test result is confirmed, he could face similar consequences, including a lengthy suspension from professional football.
On the other hand, if these allegations are proven false, they would only further undermine public confidence in media reliability.
Unlike routine transfer speculation, these accusations carry significant weight, both for Mudryk’s career and for the reputation of those reporting the claims.
For now, the situation remains uncertain and there are no verified details, and both Chelsea and Mudryk have yet to comment publicly on the matter.
As more information becomes available, the truth behind these allegations will likely come to light.
Whether the reports are accurate or simply unfounded rumors, the outcome of this situation could have far-reaching consequences for both Mudryk and the media outlets involved.
