Fulham manager Marco Silva strongly criticized VAR for its failure to recommend a red card for Malo Gusto’s challenge on Willian during Chelsea’s 1-0 victory over their west London neighbors on Saturday.
Despite Cole Palmer’s first-half injury time penalty securing the win for Chelsea, controversy arose when Gusto appeared to grab Willian’s ankle with a straight leg just before the goal. VAR, led by Michael Salisbury, did not advise referee Anthony Taylor to review the incident on the pitchside monitor, leaving Silva perplexed.
Silva expressed his dissatisfaction with the VAR decision, stating that the fourth official, Simon Hooper, agreed that the incident warranted a red card.
The French full-back’s continuation on the field left Silva questioning the consistency of decisions in the Premier League, particularly considering the potential severity of Gusto’s challenge.
Reflecting on the game, Silva acknowledged his team’s efforts but lamented the penalty that cost them the chance to lead at halftime.
He emphasized the contentious nature of Gusto’s challenge, asserting, “It’s a blatant red card for me.” Silva criticized the VAR for not intervening and suggested that similar tackles in other instances had often resulted in red cards.
Despite Chelsea having opportunities in the second half, Silva highlighted Fulham’s determination to respond and compete until the end. He mentioned that the more open nature of the game allowed both teams to showcase their attacking prowess.
When questioned about seeking an explanation for Gusto’s challenge not being deemed a red card, Silva revealed discussions with the fourth official. While not disclosing the details, he emphasized that the VAR should have taken charge of the decision, stating,
“That is an obvious VAR call at that point.” Silva argued that, despite the referee’s initial yellow card, the VAR should have intervened based on the severity of the challenge.
