Robin van Persie has reignited discussions around Manchester United’s decision to appoint Ruben Amorim as manager midway through the season. The former United striker suggested that Ruud van Nistelrooy should have remained in charge until the end of the campaign, highlighting Van Nistelrooy’s deep knowledge of the team and his proven ability to maximize player performance as key strengths.
While Van Persie recognized Amorim’s managerial capabilities, he expressed doubts about the timing of the appointment. He argued that the move has placed unnecessary pressure on both Amorim and the squad. According to Van Persie, although Amorim shows promise, he is still acclimating to his new role, and the players are facing difficulties adapting to his tactical approach. In his view, maintaining Van Nistelrooy until the season’s conclusion would have provided much-needed stability during a critical phase.
“No disrespect to Ruben Amorim, but I believe Van Nistelrooy was a better fit as Manchester United’s manager,” Van Persie commented. “He had a profound understanding of the team and knew how to bring out the best in the players. Amorim, on the other hand, is still getting to grips with the squad, and that takes time.” He added that while Amorim’s efforts deserve recognition, the ongoing struggles of the players to align with his system have complicated the transition. Delaying the managerial change until the offseason, Van Persie argued, would have been a more sensible course of action.
Van Persie’s remarks have struck a chord with Manchester United’s fanbase, which remains divided on the issue. While some fans are optimistic about Amorim’s long-term potential, others believe Van Nistelrooy’s exit came prematurely. The team’s inconsistent performances under Amorim have further fueled the debate, with many questioning whether the players have fully adapted to his tactical philosophy.
Amorim now faces a daunting task in one of football’s most high-pressure roles. In addition to addressing the split opinions among supporters, he must firmly establish his managerial vision and philosophy while contending with comparisons to Van Nistelrooy, a highly regarded figure at the club. Van Nistelrooy’s legacy as both a tactician and leader has set a high benchmark, intensifying the scrutiny on Amorim to deliver swift results.
As Manchester United navigates this transitional phase, the outcome of Amorim’s tenure could have a lasting impact on the club’s future. Van Persie’s comments have brought renewed attention to the decision-making process, sparking debates about the timing of managerial changes and their effects on the team. Whether Amorim’s appointment proves to be a calculated risk or a misstep will depend on his ability to unite the squad and achieve consistent success under challenging circumstances.
